21 thoughts on “Poll: Do you believe gun owners should compromise on gun rights?”
Helen Kallstrim
NO. HELL NO, NEVER
Charles
Hell no not ever
Michael Tappon
Enough is Enough!! Shall not be infringed means Exactly That.. We are a Republic and, these Gun Grabbing attempts are a Huge reason for the 2nd Amendment.! Enough is Enough. We have Laws already that Decent people Follow! They need to be Enforced on Those “who don’t follow them” if my neighbor keeps speeding and receives citations, other people don’t lose their RIGHTS.!!!
C D
We the people who are law biding and not law beakers.We will NEVER turn in our guns .We will defend our family’s to the end.Criminals do not care about laws. They want us disarmed. To take the GUNS away you will have a WAR We the people. We the people 2ND Amendment it.
Tim Lowry
It is shameful that law abiding citizens are under attack from the sick leftists. Taking gun rigjts of any kind weakens our ability to protect our families, communities, and country.
Gov. Inside should be removed from office and anyone that supports his Nazi platform. They have the balls to say conservatives are the hate filled Nazi like people? Look in the mirror and ANTIFA, what a joke.
Willie
Any and all politicians who propose or support gun control are committing treason. The “red flag” laws alone violate two of our amendments at once.
Frank Panei
Just remember what mao stalin and hitler did to their own people.
Cynthia wehr
Nobody has the right to make it so I can’t defend myself, and nobody had the right to try and make me afraid,. I will defend mine and I go where I want when I want because I’m an American and that’s my right
Richard Willey
The gun owners that I know , think the same as me . Would be a fool to say it in a comment viewed by who knows who.
Bill
Gun control will only do 1 thing …. create more illegal gun owners. We will not give up are guns !!
Tim Moore
HELL NO!
Amy L Gleaton
They dont care about the felons with guns because the ratio of felons to law abiding citizens is very low they want to get rid of as many guns as they can thats the law abiding citizen then you belong to them. Dont tread on me
Ann
I want 100% of MY God given rights back. What part of “shall not be infringed “ do these people not get. I say they are already tyrants. We damn sure better not let them get our weapons.
Greg
No compromise, no compliance our individual right to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed
Daniel James
I’m from Maryland and one man was already killed trying to defend his 2nd. Amendment rights due to the red flag law.
Shayne
They have the criminals in their pocket and so they go after the law abiding citizens as they have no clue what they are doing
Geary Mcdevitt
We have been compromising since 1934.
No more compromise
Do not comply
Jim
No but it doesn’t matter what we say the Dems will do what they want
Rob
No compromise, take it all back.
Rodney Heil
The short answer is, of course, no. The long answer is that we haven’t yet seen any real “compromise” being suggested by the infringers. A compromise means both sides must give a little. The infringers only want to take more and give us nothing in return. An example of a compromise might be if they repeal GCA ’68 in exchange for a 10-round magazine limit. That might be worth considering. But they aren’t interested in compromise so why should we be?
David Rice
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
NO. HELL NO, NEVER
Hell no not ever
Enough is Enough!! Shall not be infringed means Exactly That.. We are a Republic and, these Gun Grabbing attempts are a Huge reason for the 2nd Amendment.! Enough is Enough. We have Laws already that Decent people Follow! They need to be Enforced on Those “who don’t follow them” if my neighbor keeps speeding and receives citations, other people don’t lose their RIGHTS.!!!
We the people who are law biding and not law beakers.We will NEVER turn in our guns .We will defend our family’s to the end.Criminals do not care about laws. They want us disarmed. To take the GUNS away you will have a WAR We the people. We the people 2ND Amendment it.
It is shameful that law abiding citizens are under attack from the sick leftists. Taking gun rigjts of any kind weakens our ability to protect our families, communities, and country.
Gov. Inside should be removed from office and anyone that supports his Nazi platform. They have the balls to say conservatives are the hate filled Nazi like people? Look in the mirror and ANTIFA, what a joke.
Any and all politicians who propose or support gun control are committing treason. The “red flag” laws alone violate two of our amendments at once.
Just remember what mao stalin and hitler did to their own people.
Nobody has the right to make it so I can’t defend myself, and nobody had the right to try and make me afraid,. I will defend mine and I go where I want when I want because I’m an American and that’s my right
The gun owners that I know , think the same as me . Would be a fool to say it in a comment viewed by who knows who.
Gun control will only do 1 thing …. create more illegal gun owners. We will not give up are guns !!
HELL NO!
They dont care about the felons with guns because the ratio of felons to law abiding citizens is very low they want to get rid of as many guns as they can thats the law abiding citizen then you belong to them. Dont tread on me
I want 100% of MY God given rights back. What part of “shall not be infringed “ do these people not get. I say they are already tyrants. We damn sure better not let them get our weapons.
No compromise, no compliance our individual right to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed
I’m from Maryland and one man was already killed trying to defend his 2nd. Amendment rights due to the red flag law.
They have the criminals in their pocket and so they go after the law abiding citizens as they have no clue what they are doing
We have been compromising since 1934.
No more compromise
Do not comply
No but it doesn’t matter what we say the Dems will do what they want
No compromise, take it all back.
The short answer is, of course, no. The long answer is that we haven’t yet seen any real “compromise” being suggested by the infringers. A compromise means both sides must give a little. The infringers only want to take more and give us nothing in return. An example of a compromise might be if they repeal GCA ’68 in exchange for a 10-round magazine limit. That might be worth considering. But they aren’t interested in compromise so why should we be?
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.